so it does
> > still serve a purpose.
> >
> > I'd be happy to see your patch included.
>
> I've just changed my mind :) Instead of disabling BH on the read_lock
> callers, we can instead move sock_orphan outside bh_lock_sock.
>
> [TCP]: Fix sock_orphan
#x27;ve just changed my mind :) Instead of disabling BH on the read_lock
callers, we can instead move sock_orphan outside bh_lock_sock.
[TCP]: Fix sock_orphan dead lock
Calling sock_orphan inside bh_lock_sock in tcp_close can lead to dead
locks. For example, the inet_diag code holds sk_callback_lo
