From: Patrick McHardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 14:33:26 +0100
> Thomas Graf wrote:
> > The reason I did it this way is to keep validate_linkmsg() generic
> > and make it possible to put validation code which must also apply
> > to new links (dev==NULL) into that function.
>
> OK
Thomas Graf wrote:
RTM_NEWLINK allows for already existing links to be modified. For this
purpose do_setlink() is called which expects address attributes with a
payload length of at least dev->addr_len. This patch adds the necessary
validation for the RTM_NEWLINK case.
The address length for lin
RTM_NEWLINK allows for already existing links to be modified. For this
purpose do_setlink() is called which expects address attributes with a
payload length of at least dev->addr_len. This patch adds the necessary
validation for the RTM_NEWLINK case.
The address length for links to be created is n
