From: Ralf Baechle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 14:31:41 +0100
> The locking rule for rose_remove_neigh() are that the called needs to
> hold rose_neigh_list_lock, so we better don't take it yet again in
> rose_neigh_list_lock.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Ap
Ralf Baechle wrote:
The locking rule for rose_remove_neigh() are that the called needs to
hold rose_neigh_list_lock, so we better don't take it yet again in
rose_neigh_list_lock.
Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
All ROSE and HZ patches applied to kernel 2.6.16
Many thanks Ralf
The locking rule for rose_remove_neigh() are that the called needs to
hold rose_neigh_list_lock, so we better don't take it yet again in
rose_neigh_list_lock.
Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
net/rose/rose_route.c |5 -
1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
Index: linux-net.git/
