On Mon, 29 Aug 2016 17:06:34 +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> On 08/26/2016 08:06 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > [...]
> > @@ -372,6 +377,7 @@ static int cls_bpf_modify_existing(struct net *net,
> > struct tcf_proto *tp,
> > {
> > bool is_bpf, is_ebpf, have_exts = false;
> > struct tcf_ext
On 08/26/2016 08:06 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
Add cls_bpf support for the TCA_CLS_FLAGS_SKIP_HW flag.
Unlike U32 and flower cls_bpf already has some netlink
flags defined. I chose to create a new attribute to be
able to use the same flag values as the above.
Unknown flags are ignored and not re
Add cls_bpf support for the TCA_CLS_FLAGS_SKIP_HW flag.
Unlike U32 and flower cls_bpf already has some netlink
flags defined. I chose to create a new attribute to be
able to use the same flag values as the above.
Unknown flags are ignored and not reported upon dump.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski
