On Wednesday, 6 February 2019 20:08:14 CET Linus Lüssing wrote:
> Ok, will rewrite the batctl part later then. And probably keep "batctl
> mm" as a (hidden?) option for compatibility reasons?
Yes, sounds good.
Kind regards,
Sven
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed messa
On Wed, Feb 06, 2019 at 07:20:25PM +0100, Sven Eckelmann wrote:
> On Tuesday, 5 February 2019 20.24.10 CET Linus Lüssing wrote:
> [...]
> > Another thought, if all this is too vague for now...
>
> Yes, it is to vague for the integration in netlink :D
>
> > what about
> > ommiting the BATADV_ATTR
On Tuesday, 5 February 2019 20.24.10 CET Linus Lüssing wrote:
[...]
> Another thought, if all this is too vague for now...
Yes, it is to vague for the integration in netlink :D
> what about
> ommiting the BATADV_ATTR_MULTICAST_(MODE)_ENABLED for now and use
> a reverse logic instead? Like
> BATA
On Sat, Jan 26, 2019 at 11:47:20AM +0100, Sven Eckelmann wrote:
> On Saturday, 19 January 2019 16.56.07 CET Sven Eckelmann wrote:
> [...]
> > There were also two topics which were not yet really discussed and thus
> > these requests (from Linus) were not yet implemented:
>
> @Jiri, @Linus maybe yo
On Saturday, January 26, 2019 11:47:20 AM CET Sven Eckelmann wrote:
> Aggregated OGM is currently defined as:
>
>
> * according to batctl manpage:
>
> aggregation|ag [0|1]
>If no parameter is given the current aggregation setting
>is displayed. Otherwise the parameter
Sat, Jan 26, 2019 at 11:47:20AM CET, s...@narfation.org wrote:
>On Saturday, 19 January 2019 16.56.07 CET Sven Eckelmann wrote:
>[...]
>> There were also two topics which were not yet really discussed and thus
>> these requests (from Linus) were not yet implemented:
>
>@Jiri, @Linus maybe you can d
On Saturday, 19 January 2019 16.56.07 CET Sven Eckelmann wrote:
[...]
> There were also two topics which were not yet really discussed and thus
> these requests (from Linus) were not yet implemented:
@Jiri, @Linus maybe you can discuss these topics further and select the
correct solution.
> * co
Sat, Jan 19, 2019 at 04:56:07PM CET, s...@narfation.org wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Jiri Pirko called the batman-adv configuration interface a while back "a
>huge mistake" [1] and suggested genl as alternative. The first
>reimplementation [2] (based on the team/devlink design) was rejected. This
>second impleme
Hi,
Jiri Pirko called the batman-adv configuration interface a while back "a
huge mistake" [1] and suggested genl as alternative. The first
reimplementation [2] (based on the team/devlink design) was rejected. This
second implementation is now using a nl80211-like design. The objects which
can now
