> From: Jacob Keller
> Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2020 1:15 AM
>
> On 5/18/2020 10:17 PM, Parav Pandit wrote:
> > Hi Jake,
> >
>
> >> Ok. So in the smart NIC CPU, we'd see the primary PF and some child
> >> PFs, and in the host system we'd see a "primary PF" that is the other
> >> end of the asso
On 5/18/2020 10:17 PM, Parav Pandit wrote:
> Hi Jake,
>
>> Ok. So in the smart NIC CPU, we'd see the primary PF and some child PFs,
>> and in the host system we'd see a "primary PF" that is the other end of the
>> associated Child PF, and might be able to manage its own subswitch.
>>
>> Ok thi
Mon, May 18, 2020 at 11:05:45PM CEST, jacob.e.kel...@intel.com wrote:
>
>
>On 5/17/2020 11:52 PM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> Fri, May 15, 2020 at 11:36:19PM CEST, jacob.e.kel...@intel.com wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 5/15/2020 2:30 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
Fri, May 15, 2020 at 01:52:54AM CEST, jacob.e.kel...@
Hi Jake,
> From: netdev-ow...@vger.kernel.org On
> Behalf Of Jacob Keller
>
>
> On 5/17/2020 11:52 PM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> > Fri, May 15, 2020 at 11:36:19PM CEST, jacob.e.kel...@intel.com wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 5/15/2020 2:30 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> >>> Fri, May 15, 2020 at 01:52:54AM CEST, j
On 5/17/2020 11:52 PM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Fri, May 15, 2020 at 11:36:19PM CEST, jacob.e.kel...@intel.com wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 5/15/2020 2:30 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>>> Fri, May 15, 2020 at 01:52:54AM CEST, jacob.e.kel...@intel.com wrote:
> $ devlink port add pci/.06.00.0/100 flavour pcisf
Fri, May 15, 2020 at 11:36:19PM CEST, jacob.e.kel...@intel.com wrote:
>
>
>On 5/15/2020 2:30 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> Fri, May 15, 2020 at 01:52:54AM CEST, jacob.e.kel...@intel.com wrote:
$ devlink port add pci/.06.00.0/100 flavour pcisf pfnum 1 sfnum 10
>>>
>>> Can you clarify what s
On 5/15/2020 2:30 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Fri, May 15, 2020 at 01:52:54AM CEST, jacob.e.kel...@intel.com wrote:
>>> $ devlink port add pci/.06.00.0/100 flavour pcisf pfnum 1 sfnum 10
>>>
>>
>> Can you clarify what sfnum means here? and why is it different from the
>> index? I get that the in
Fri, May 15, 2020 at 01:52:54AM CEST, jacob.e.kel...@intel.com wrote:
>
>
>On 5/1/2020 2:14 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> ==
>> || ||
>> || SF (subfunction) user cmdline
On 5/1/2020 2:14 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> ==
> || ||
> || SF (subfunction) user cmdline API draft ||
> ||
Wed, May 13, 2020 at 03:00:09PM CEST, simon.hor...@netronome.com wrote:
>On Fri, May 01, 2020 at 11:14:49AM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> Hi all.
>>
>> First, I would like to apologize for very long email. But I think it
>> would be beneficial to the see the whole picture, where we are going.
>>
>>
On Fri, May 01, 2020 at 11:14:49AM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> First, I would like to apologize for very long email. But I think it
> would be beneficial to the see the whole picture, where we are going.
>
> Currently we are working internally on several features with
> need of extensi
On 5/10/2020 7:45 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Hello guys.
>
> Anyone has any opinion on the proposal? Or should I take it as a silent
> agreement? :)
I am still reading through this whole thing. I haven't given feedback
yet because it is a lot to process.
-Jake
Sun, May 10, 2020 at 06:30:59PM CEST, dave.t...@gmail.com wrote:
>On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 7:46 AM Jiri Pirko wrote:
>>
>> Hello guys.
>>
>> Anyone has any opinion on the proposal? Or should I take it as a silent
>> agreement? :)
>>
>> We would like to go ahead and start sending patchsets.
>
>I got
On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 7:46 AM Jiri Pirko wrote:
>
> Hello guys.
>
> Anyone has any opinion on the proposal? Or should I take it as a silent
> agreement? :)
>
> We would like to go ahead and start sending patchsets.
I gotta say that the whole thing makes my head really hurt, and while
this conve
Hello guys.
Anyone has any opinion on the proposal? Or should I take it as a silent
agreement? :)
We would like to go ahead and start sending patchsets.
Thanks!
Mon, May 04, 2020 at 04:12:18AM CEST, sridhar.samudr...@intel.com wrote:
>
>
>On 5/1/2020 2:14 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> Hi all.
>>
>> First, I would like to apologize for very long email. But I think it
>> would be beneficial to the see the whole picture, where we are going.
>>
>> Currently we ar
On 5/1/2020 2:14 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
Hi all.
First, I would like to apologize for very long email. But I think it
would be beneficial to the see the whole picture, where we are going.
Currently we are working internally on several features with
need of extension of the current devlink infr
Hi all.
First, I would like to apologize for very long email. But I think it
would be beneficial to the see the whole picture, where we are going.
Currently we are working internally on several features with
need of extension of the current devlink infrastructure. I took a stab
at putting it all
18 matches
Mail list logo
