On Fri, Jul 03, 2015 at 09:41:41AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-07-03 at 07:51 -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 02, 2015 at 02:54:56PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > It's not clear to me that the sctp_fwdtsn_skip array is
> > > always initialized when used.
> > >
> > > It is
On Fri, 2015-07-03 at 07:51 -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 02, 2015 at 02:54:56PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > It's not clear to me that the sctp_fwdtsn_skip array is
> > always initialized when used.
> >
> > It is appropriate to initialize the array to 0?
> >
> > This patch initializes
On Thu, Jul 02, 2015 at 02:54:56PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> It's not clear to me that the sctp_fwdtsn_skip array is
> always initialized when used.
>
> It is appropriate to initialize the array to 0?
>
> This patch initializes the array too 0 and moves the
> local variables into the blocks whe
It's not clear to me that the sctp_fwdtsn_skip array is
always initialized when used.
It is appropriate to initialize the array to 0?
This patch initializes the array too 0 and moves the
local variables into the blocks where used.
It also does some miscellaneous neatening by using
continue; and
