Hi David,
What's next ? do you plan to send a v3 or should I do it ?
On 09/11/2017 10:02 AM, Amine Kherbouche wrote:
Hi David,
Do you plan to send a v3?
On 21/08/2017 18:15, David Lamparter wrote:
Hi all,
this is an update on the earlier "[RFC net-next] VPLS support". Note
I've changed th
Hi David,
Do you plan to send a v3?
On 21/08/2017 18:15, David Lamparter wrote:
Hi all,
this is an update on the earlier "[RFC net-next] VPLS support". Note
I've changed the subject lines on some of the patches to better reflect
what they really do (tbh the earlier subject lines were crap.)
On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 02:55:04PM +0300, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
> On 22/08/17 14:32, David Lamparter wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 02:01:40PM +0300, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
> >> On 22/08/17 03:01, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> >>> I know the bridge is an easy target to extend L2 forwardin
On 22/08/17 14:32, David Lamparter wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 02:01:40PM +0300, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
>> On 22/08/17 03:01, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
>>> I know the bridge is an easy target to extend L2 forwarding, but it is not
>>> the only option. Have you condidered building a new driv
On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 02:01:40PM +0300, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
> On 22/08/17 03:01, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > I know the bridge is an easy target to extend L2 forwarding, but it is not
> > the only option. Have you condidered building a new driver (like VXLAN does)
> > which does the forwa
On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 09:43:15PM -0700, Roopa Prabhu wrote:
> > This is relevant to the discussion because it's a feature which is
> > non-obvious (to me) on how to do with the VXLAN model of having an
> > entirely separate FDB. Meanwhile, with this architecture, the proof of
> > concept / hack
On 22/08/17 03:01, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Aug 2017 19:15:17 +0200
> David Lamparter wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>>
>> this is an update on the earlier "[RFC net-next] VPLS support". Note
>> I've changed the subject lines on some of the patches to better reflect
>> what they really do (
On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 10:15 AM, David Lamparter wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
> this is an update on the earlier "[RFC net-next] VPLS support". Note
> I've changed the subject lines on some of the patches to better reflect
> what they really do (tbh the earlier subject lines were crap.)
>
> As previousl
On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 05:01:51PM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Aug 2017 19:15:17 +0200 David Lamparter wrote:
> > > P.S.: For a little context on the bridge FDB changes - I'm hoping to
> > > find some time to extend this to the MDB to allow aggregating dst
> > > metadata and handi
On Mon, 21 Aug 2017 19:15:17 +0200
David Lamparter wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
> this is an update on the earlier "[RFC net-next] VPLS support". Note
> I've changed the subject lines on some of the patches to better reflect
> what they really do (tbh the earlier subject lines were crap.)
>
> As prev
Hi all,
this is an update on the earlier "[RFC net-next] VPLS support". Note
I've changed the subject lines on some of the patches to better reflect
what they really do (tbh the earlier subject lines were crap.)
As previously, iproute2 / FRR patches are at:
- https://github.com/eqvinox/vpls-ipr
11 matches
Mail list logo
