2018-04-09 18:47 UTC-0700 ~ Alexei Starovoitov
> On Mon, Apr 09, 2018 at 02:25:26PM +0100, Quentin Monnet wrote:
>>
>> Anyway, I am fine with keeping just signatures, descriptions and return
>> values for now. I will submit a new version with only those items.
>
> Thank you.
>
> Could you also s
On Mon, Apr 09, 2018 at 02:25:26PM +0100, Quentin Monnet wrote:
>
> Anyway, I am fine with keeping just signatures, descriptions and return
> values for now. I will submit a new version with only those items.
Thank you.
Could you also split it into few patches?
include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 2237
2018-04-09 12:52 UTC+0200 ~ Markus Heiser
>
>> Am 09.04.2018 um 12:08 schrieb Daniel Borkmann :
> [...]
>
>>> May I completely misunderstood you, so correct my if I'am wrong:
>>>
>>> - ./scripts/bpf_helpers_doc.py : produces reST markup from C-comments
>>> - ./scripts/kerne-doc : produc
2018-04-09 11:01 UTC+0200 ~ Daniel Borkmann
> On 04/06/2018 01:11 PM, Quentin Monnet wrote:
>> eBPF helper functions can be called from within eBPF programs to perform
>> a variety of tasks that would be otherwise hard or impossible to do with
>> eBPF itself. There is a growing number of such help
> Am 09.04.2018 um 12:08 schrieb Daniel Borkmann :
[...]
>> May I completely misunderstood you, so correct my if I'am wrong:
>>
>> - ./scripts/bpf_helpers_doc.py : produces reST markup from C-comments
>> - ./scripts/kerne-doc : produces reST markup from C-comments
>>
>> IMO: both are d
On 04/09/2018 11:35 AM, Markus Heiser wrote:
>
>> Am 09.04.2018 um 11:25 schrieb Daniel Borkmann :
>>
>> On 04/09/2018 11:21 AM, Markus Heiser wrote:
>> [...]
>>> Do we really need another kernel-doc parser?
>>>
>>> ./scripts/kernel-doc include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
>>>
>>> should already do the job (
> Am 09.04.2018 um 11:25 schrieb Daniel Borkmann :
>
> On 04/09/2018 11:21 AM, Markus Heiser wrote:
> [...]
>> Do we really need another kernel-doc parser?
>>
>> ./scripts/kernel-doc include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
>>
>> should already do the job (producing .rst). For more infos, take a look at
>
>
On 04/06/2018 01:11 PM, Quentin Monnet wrote:
>> eBPF helper functions can be called from within eBPF programs to perform
>> a variety of tasks that would be otherwise hard or impossible to do with
>> eBPF itself. There is a growing number of such helper functions in the
>> kernel, but documentatio
On 04/09/2018 11:21 AM, Markus Heiser wrote:
[...]
> Do we really need another kernel-doc parser?
>
> ./scripts/kernel-doc include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
>
> should already do the job (producing .rst). For more infos, take a look at
This has absolutely zero to do with kernel-doc, but rather producin
On 04/06/2018 01:11 PM, Quentin Monnet wrote:
> eBPF helper functions can be called from within eBPF programs to perform
> a variety of tasks that would be otherwise hard or impossible to do with
> eBPF itself. There is a growing number of such helper functions in the
> kernel, but documentation is
On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 12:11:22PM +0100, Quentin Monnet wrote:
> eBPF helper functions can be called from within eBPF programs to perform
> a variety of tasks that would be otherwise hard or impossible to do with
> eBPF itself. There is a growing number of such helper functions in the
> kernel, bu
eBPF helper functions can be called from within eBPF programs to perform
a variety of tasks that would be otherwise hard or impossible to do with
eBPF itself. There is a growing number of such helper functions in the
kernel, but documentation is scarce. The main user space header file
does contain
12 matches
Mail list logo
