Ben Greear wrote:
> Patrick McHardy wrote:
>
>> Ben Greear wrote:
>>
>>> Patrick McHardy wrote:
>>>
The last VLAN patchset was outdated, sorry about the mixup. These
are the
correct patches. The iproute patch I posted was correct, so no
repost of
that one.
>>>
Patrick McHardy wrote:
Ben Greear wrote:
Patrick McHardy wrote:
The last VLAN patchset was outdated, sorry about the mixup. These are the
correct patches. The iproute patch I posted was correct, so no repost of
that one.
Is there any significant performance penalty in creating VLANs using
Ben Greear wrote:
> Patrick McHardy wrote:
>
>> The last VLAN patchset was outdated, sorry about the mixup. These are the
>> correct patches. The iproute patch I posted was correct, so no repost of
>> that one.
>>
>>
>
> Is there any significant performance penalty in creating VLANs using
> th
Patrick McHardy wrote:
The last VLAN patchset was outdated, sorry about the mixup. These are the
correct patches. The iproute patch I posted was correct, so no repost of
that one.
Is there any significant performance penalty in creating VLANs using
these patches?
If you have a test station
The last VLAN patchset was outdated, sorry about the mixup. These are the
correct patches. The iproute patch I posted was correct, so no repost of
that one.
include/linux/if_link.h | 25 ++
include/linux/if_vlan.h |7
net/8021q/Makefile |2
net/8021q/vlan.c | 537 +++
