On Mon, 12 Sep 2016 08:52:14 -0700
Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-09-12 at 07:55 -0700, kan.li...@intel.com wrote:
> > From: Kan Liang
> >
>
> >
> > Documentation/networking/netpolicy.txt | 157
>
>
> I find this patch series very suspect, as
> Documentation/networking/scaling
On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 8:38 AM, Florian Westphal wrote:
> kan.li...@intel.com wrote:
>> From: Kan Liang
>>
>> It is a big challenge to get good network performance. First, the network
>> performance is not good with default system settings. Second, it is too
>
> [..]
>
> I ask to be dropped fro
On Mon, 2016-09-12 at 07:55 -0700, kan.li...@intel.com wrote:
> From: Kan Liang
>
>
> Documentation/networking/netpolicy.txt | 157
I find this patch series very suspect, as
Documentation/networking/scaling.txt is untouched.
I highly recommend you present your ideas at next netdev conf
kan.li...@intel.com wrote:
> From: Kan Liang
>
> It is a big challenge to get good network performance. First, the network
> performance is not good with default system settings. Second, it is too
[..]
I ask to be dropped from CC list of further submissions of this series,
I've said all I have
From: Kan Liang
It is a big challenge to get good network performance. First, the network
performance is not good with default system settings. Second, it is too
difficult to do automatic tuning for all possible workloads, since workloads
have different requirements. Some workloads may want high
