Re: [RFC PATCHv5 4/5] [TCP]: new LOST marker optimizations

2007-03-24 Thread David Miller
From: "Ilpo_Järvinen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 20:41:05 +0200 > 1) Couple of skb states are mutually exclusive > > Skb cannot be in both S and L states at the same time, adding > non-S nor L skb count (below highest sack) to that can be > compared against fackets_out to see if a

[RFC PATCHv5 4/5] [TCP]: new LOST marker optimizations

2007-03-16 Thread Ilpo Järvinen
1) Couple of skb states are mutually exclusive Skb cannot be in both S and L states at the same time, adding non-S nor L skb count (below highest sack) to that can be compared against fackets_out to see if anything below the current skb can still be marked with L or not. If they're equal (or facke