Re: [RFC PATCHv5 3/5] [TCP]: Reworked recovery's TCPCB_LOST marking functions

2007-03-24 Thread David Miller
From: "Ilpo_Järvinen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 20:41:04 +0200 > Complete rewrite for update_scoreboard and mark_head_lost. Couple > of hints became unnecessary because of this change, NewReno code > was greatly simplified. I changed !TCPCB_TAGBITS check from the > original to a !

[RFC PATCHv5 3/5] [TCP]: Reworked recovery's TCPCB_LOST marking functions

2007-03-16 Thread Ilpo Järvinen
Complete rewrite for update_scoreboard and mark_head_lost. Couple of hints became unnecessary because of this change, NewReno code was greatly simplified. I changed !TCPCB_TAGBITS check from the original to a !(S|L) check but it shouldn't make a difference, and if there ever is a R only skb TCP wil