Hi,
Lawrence Brakmo wrote:
> Based on comments by Neal Cardwell to tcp_nv patch:
>
> AFAICT this patch would not require an increase in the size of sk_buff
> cb[] if it were to take advantage of the fact that the tcp_skb_cb
> header.h4 and header.h6 fields are only used in the packet recept
Based on comments by Neal Cardwell to tcp_nv patch:
AFAICT this patch would not require an increase in the size of sk_buff
cb[] if it were to take advantage of the fact that the tcp_skb_cb
header.h4 and header.h6 fields are only used in the packet reception
code path, and this in_flight fi
