Alexandre Belloni writes:
> On 22/12/2020 16:01:22+0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>> > The problem is that the switch core reset also affects (reset) the
>> > SGPIO controller.
>> >
>> > We tried to put this in the reset driver, but it was rejected. If the
>> > reset is done at probe time, the SGPIO d
On 22.12.2020 16:01, Andrew Lunn wrote:
EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the
content is safe
> > +static void sparx5_board_init(struct sparx5 *sparx5)
> > +{
> > + int idx;
> > +
> > + if (!sparx5->sd_sgpio_remapping)
> > + return;
> >
Hi Andrew,
On Sat, 2020-12-19 at 20:11 +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you
> know the content is safe
>
> On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 08:51:28AM +0100, Steen Hegelund wrote:
>
> > +static struct sparx5_io_resource sparx5_iomap[] = {
>
> Thi
On 22/12/2020 16:01:22+0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > The problem is that the switch core reset also affects (reset) the
> > SGPIO controller.
> >
> > We tried to put this in the reset driver, but it was rejected. If the
> > reset is done at probe time, the SGPIO driver may already have
> > initiali
> > > +static void sparx5_board_init(struct sparx5 *sparx5)
> > > +{
> > > + int idx;
> > > +
> > > + if (!sparx5->sd_sgpio_remapping)
> > > + return;
> > > +
> > > + /* Enable SGPIO Signal Detect remapping */
> > > + spx5_rmw(GCB_HW_SGPIO_SD_CFG_SD_MAP_SEL,
> > > +
On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 08:51:28AM +0100, Steen Hegelund wrote:
> +static struct sparx5_io_resource sparx5_iomap[] = {
This could be made const i think,.
> + { TARGET_DEV2G5, 0, 0 }, /* 0x610004000: dev2g5_0 */
> + { TARGET_DEV5G, 0x4000,0 }, /* 0x610008000:
