On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 13:53, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
> On 16/01/2021 17:39, Joachim Wiberg wrote:
>> We have discussed at length at work if an IGMP snooping implementation
>> really belongs in the bridge, or if it's better suited as a user space
>> daemon? Similar to what was decided for RST
On 16/01/2021 17:39, Joachim Wiberg wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 14:15, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
>> On 12/01/2021 15:59, Horatiu Vultur wrote:
>>> Based on the comments of the previous version, we started to work on a
>>> new version, so it would be possible to enable/disable queries per vla
On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 14:15, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
> On 12/01/2021 15:59, Horatiu Vultur wrote:
>> Based on the comments of the previous version, we started to work on a
>> new version, so it would be possible to enable/disable queries per vlan.
>> [snip]
>> We were wondering if this what y
The 01/13/2021 14:15, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the
> content is safe
>
> On 12/01/2021 15:59, Horatiu Vultur wrote:
> > Based on the comments of the previous version, we started to work on a
> > new version, so it would be
On 12/01/2021 15:59, Horatiu Vultur wrote:
> Based on the comments of the previous version, we started to work on a
> new version, so it would be possible to enable/disable queries per vlan.
> This is still work in progress and there are plenty of things that are
> not implemented and tested:
> - i
Based on the comments of the previous version, we started to work on a
new version, so it would be possible to enable/disable queries per vlan.
This is still work in progress and there are plenty of things that are
not implemented and tested:
- ipv6 support
- the fast path needs to be improved
- cu
