Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 1/1] Allow 0.0.0.0/8 as a valid address range

2019-06-13 Thread Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
Dave Taht writes: > The longstanding prohibition against using 0.0.0.0/8 dates back > to two issues with the early internet. > > There was an interoperability problem with BSD 4.2 in 1984, fixed in > BSD 4.3 in 1986. BSD 4.2 has long since been retired. > > Secondly, addresses of the form 0.x.y.

[RFC PATCH net-next 1/1] Allow 0.0.0.0/8 as a valid address range

2019-06-13 Thread Dave Taht
The longstanding prohibition against using 0.0.0.0/8 dates back to two issues with the early internet. There was an interoperability problem with BSD 4.2 in 1984, fixed in BSD 4.3 in 1986. BSD 4.2 has long since been retired. Secondly, addresses of the form 0.x.y.z were initially defined only as