On 12/15/2016 02:07 AM, Or Gerlitz wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 1:01 AM, Jarno Rajahalme wrote:
>> This patch is a proof-of-concept I did a few months ago for UDP tunnel
>> offload support in virtio_net interface [..]
>
> What's the use case you were considering for a guest running a UDP base
On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 1:01 AM, Jarno Rajahalme wrote:
> This patch is a proof-of-concept I did a few months ago for UDP tunnel
> offload support in virtio_net interface [..]
What's the use case you were considering for a guest running a UDP based VTEP?
> Real implementation needs to extend the
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 03:01:57PM -0800, Jarno Rajahalme wrote:
> This patch is a proof-of-concept I did a few months ago for UDP tunnel
> offload support in virtio_net interface, and rebased on to the current
> net-next.
>
> Real implementation needs to extend the virtio_net header rather than
>
This patch is a proof-of-concept I did a few months ago for UDP tunnel
offload support in virtio_net interface, and rebased on to the current
net-next.
Real implementation needs to extend the virtio_net header rather than
piggy-backing on existing fields. Inner MAC length (or inner network
offset
