From: "Ilpo_Järvinen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 13:26:05 +0300 (EEST)
> Hmm, SACK code is under such flux currently that I'll
> have to deal conflicts almost daily due to overlapping ideas...
Welcome to my world, just scale it to 800 patches and entire
networking tree :-
-
On Wed, 10 Oct 2007, David Miller wrote:
> From: "Ilpo_Järvinen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 13:28:42 +0300
>
> > After couple of wrong-wayed before/after()s and one infinite
> > loopy version, here's the current trial version of a sacktag
> > cache usage recode
> >
> > Tw
From: "Ilpo_Järvinen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 13:28:42 +0300
> After couple of wrong-wayed before/after()s and one infinite
> loopy version, here's the current trial version of a sacktag
> cache usage recode
>
> Two first patches come from tcp-2.6 (rebased and rotated).
>
Hi all,
After couple of wrong-wayed before/after()s and one infinite
loopy version, here's the current trial version of a sacktag
cache usage recode
Two first patches come from tcp-2.6 (rebased and rotated).
This series apply cleanly only on top of the other three patch
series I posted earl