On 2021-03-23 19:56, Jay Vosburgh wrote:
Maxim Mikityanskiy wrote:
On 2021-03-22 16:09, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 02:38:46PM +0200, Maxim Mikityanskiy wrote:
After lockdep gets triggered for the first time, it gets disabled, and
lockdep_enabled() will return false. It wi
Maxim Mikityanskiy wrote:
>On 2021-03-22 16:09, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 02:38:46PM +0200, Maxim Mikityanskiy wrote:
>>> After lockdep gets triggered for the first time, it gets disabled, and
>>> lockdep_enabled() will return false. It will affect lockdep_is_held(),
>>> w
On 2021-03-22 16:09, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 02:38:46PM +0200, Maxim Mikityanskiy wrote:
After lockdep gets triggered for the first time, it gets disabled, and
lockdep_enabled() will return false. It will affect lockdep_is_held(),
which will start returning true all the ti
On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 02:38:46PM +0200, Maxim Mikityanskiy wrote:
> After lockdep gets triggered for the first time, it gets disabled, and
> lockdep_enabled() will return false. It will affect lockdep_is_held(),
> which will start returning true all the time. Normally, it just disables
> checks t
After lockdep gets triggered for the first time, it gets disabled, and
lockdep_enabled() will return false. It will affect lockdep_is_held(),
which will start returning true all the time. Normally, it just disables
checks that expect a lock to be held. However, the bonding code checks
that a lock i
