Re: [RFC PATCH bpf-next] libbpf: make bpf_object__open default to UNSPEC

2018-11-23 Thread Wangnan (F)
On 2018/11/23 5:52, Daniel Borkmann wrote: > [ +Wang ] > > On 11/22/2018 07:03 AM, Nikita V. Shirokov wrote: >> currently by default libbpf's bpf_object__open requires >> bpf's program to specify version in a code because of two things: >> 1) default prog type is set to KPROBE >> 2) KPROBE req

Re: [RFC PATCH bpf-next] libbpf: make bpf_object__open default to UNSPEC

2018-11-22 Thread Daniel Borkmann
[ +Wang ] On 11/22/2018 07:03 AM, Nikita V. Shirokov wrote: > currently by default libbpf's bpf_object__open requires > bpf's program to specify version in a code because of two things: > 1) default prog type is set to KPROBE > 2) KPROBE requires (in kernel/bpf/syscall.c) version to be specified

[RFC PATCH bpf-next] libbpf: make bpf_object__open default to UNSPEC

2018-11-21 Thread Nikita V. Shirokov
currently by default libbpf's bpf_object__open requires bpf's program to specify version in a code because of two things: 1) default prog type is set to KPROBE 2) KPROBE requires (in kernel/bpf/syscall.c) version to be specified in this RFC i'm proposing change default to UNSPEC and also changing