On Wed, 27 July 2005 14:34:19 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> >
> > Ok, here I won't agree to disagree with you. !foo as a check for
> > NULL is a reasonable idea, but not my style. If that's the preferred
> > style for the kernel, I will do that.
> >
> > But (var == constant) is a style that
> On Jul 27, 2005, at 13:08, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >> On Jul 25, 2005, at 16:06, Francois Romieu wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> +int mdiobus_register(struct mii_bus *bus)
> +{
> +int i;
> +int err = 0;
> +
> +spin_lock_init(&bus->mdio_lock);
> +
>
Andy Fleming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
[kcalloc]
> Should we move the function, then, to include/linux/slab.h? Or
> somewhere else?
It is already in mm/slab.c
[rc = request_irq(...)]
It appears in drivers/net/*c. Jeff Garzik used to suggest something
similar but it does not matter as long as you
On Jul 27, 2005, at 13:08, Randy Dunlap wrote:
On Jul 25, 2005, at 16:06, Francois Romieu wrote:
+int mdiobus_register(struct mii_bus *bus)
+{
+int i;
+int err = 0;
+
+spin_lock_init(&bus->mdio_lock);
+
+if (NULL == bus || NULL == bus->name ||
+NULL == bus->re
> On Jul 25, 2005, at 16:06, Francois Romieu wrote:
>
>
> >> +int mdiobus_register(struct mii_bus *bus)
> >> +{
> >> +int i;
> >> +int err = 0;
> >> +
> >> +spin_lock_init(&bus->mdio_lock);
> >> +
> >> +if (NULL == bus || NULL == bus->name ||
> >> +NULL == bus->read |
On Jul 25, 2005, at 16:06, Francois Romieu wrote:
[snip]
+config DAVICOM_PHY
+bool "Drivers for Davicom PHYs"
+depends on PHYLIB
+---help---
+ Currently supports dm9161e and dm9131
[snip]
Yeah, I resisted splitting the patch up for this reason. Suffice it
to say, you
Andy Fleming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
> This patch contains the PHY layer itself, no phy drivers
[...]
> diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/Kconfig b/drivers/net/phy/Kconfig
> new file mode 100644
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/net/phy/Kconfig
[...]
> +config MARVELL_PHY
> + bool "Drivers for Marvell P