On 16-11-15 05:32 AM, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
>
> (looks like my message didn't reach the netdev list, due to me sending
> from the wrong email, forwarded message again):
>
> On Thu, 10 Nov 2016 20:44:08 -0800 John Fastabend
> wrote:
>
>> ---
>> include/linux/ptr_ring_ll.h | 136
>> ++
On 16-11-14 03:01 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 08:44:08PM -0800, John Fastabend wrote:
>>
>> ---
>> include/linux/ptr_ring_ll.h | 136
>> +++
>> include/linux/skb_array.h | 25
>> 2 files changed, 161 insertions(+)
>
On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 02:32:58PM +0100, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> What I would really like to see is a lock-free (locked cmpxchg) queue
> implementation, what like ptr_ring use the array as empty/full check,
> and still (somehow) support bulking.
I think lock-free is overrated for this use
(looks like my message didn't reach the netdev list, due to me sending
from the wrong email, forwarded message again):
On Thu, 10 Nov 2016 20:44:08 -0800 John Fastabend
wrote:
> ---
> include/linux/ptr_ring_ll.h | 136
> +++
> include/linux/skb_array.
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 08:44:08PM -0800, John Fastabend wrote:
>
> ---
> include/linux/ptr_ring_ll.h | 136
> +++
> include/linux/skb_array.h | 25
> 2 files changed, 161 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 include/linux/ptr_ring_ll.h
>
> d
On Thu, 10 Nov 2016 20:44:08 -0800 John Fastabend
wrote:
> ---
> include/linux/ptr_ring_ll.h | 136
> +++
> include/linux/skb_array.h | 25
> 2 files changed, 161 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 include/linux/ptr_ring_ll.h
>
> diff --
---
include/linux/ptr_ring_ll.h | 136 +++
include/linux/skb_array.h | 25
2 files changed, 161 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 include/linux/ptr_ring_ll.h
diff --git a/include/linux/ptr_ring_ll.h b/include/linux/ptr_ring_ll.h
new file mode
