Re: [RFC PATCH 0/9] RFC6864 compliant GRO and GSO partial offload

2016-03-21 Thread Jesse Gross
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 12:46 PM, Alexander Duyck wrote: > On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 11:50 AM, David Miller wrote: >> From: Alexander Duyck >> Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 16:24:38 -0700 >> >>> This patch series addresses two things. >>> >>> First it enables what I am calling RFC6864 compliant GRO. Bas

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/9] RFC6864 compliant GRO and GSO partial offload

2016-03-21 Thread Alexander Duyck
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 11:50 AM, David Miller wrote: > From: Alexander Duyck > Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 16:24:38 -0700 > >> This patch series addresses two things. >> >> First it enables what I am calling RFC6864 compliant GRO. Basically what >> I am doing is allowing one of two patterns for inco

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/9] RFC6864 compliant GRO and GSO partial offload

2016-03-21 Thread David Miller
From: Alexander Duyck Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 16:24:38 -0700 > This patch series addresses two things. > > First it enables what I am calling RFC6864 compliant GRO. Basically what > I am doing is allowing one of two patterns for incoming frames. Either the > IP ID will increment, or if the DF b

[RFC PATCH 0/9] RFC6864 compliant GRO and GSO partial offload

2016-03-18 Thread Alexander Duyck
This patch series addresses two things. First it enables what I am calling RFC6864 compliant GRO. Basically what I am doing is allowing one of two patterns for incoming frames. Either the IP ID will increment, or if the DF bit is set it can either increment or stay the same value. This allows u