Hi,
On Fri, 2017-12-01 at 14:07 -0800, Cong Wang wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 3:05 AM, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> >
> > Thank you for the feedback.
> >
> > I tested your patch and in the above scenario I measure:
> >
> > real0m0.017s
> > user0m0.000s
> > sys 0m0.017s
> >
> > so it ap
On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 3:05 AM, Paolo Abeni wrote:
>
> Thank you for the feedback.
>
> I tested your patch and in the above scenario I measure:
>
> real0m0.017s
> user0m0.000s
> sys 0m0.017s
>
> so it apparently works well for this case.
Thanks a lot for testing it! I will test it fur
On Thu, 2017-11-30 at 23:14 -0800, Cong Wang wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 6:25 AM, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> > Currently deleting qdisc with a large number of children and filters
> > can take a lot of time:
> >
> > tc qdisc add dev lo root htb
> > for I in `seq 1 1000`; do
> > tc class ad
On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 6:25 AM, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> Currently deleting qdisc with a large number of children and filters
> can take a lot of time:
>
> tc qdisc add dev lo root htb
> for I in `seq 1 1000`; do
> tc class add dev lo parent 1: classid 1:$I htb rate 100kbit
> tc qdisc
Hi,
On Wed, 2017-11-29 at 08:14 -0800, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 6:25 AM, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> > Currently deleting qdisc with a large number of children and filters
> > can take a lot of time:
> >
> > tc qdisc add dev lo root htb
> > for I in `seq 1 1000`; do
> >
On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 6:25 AM, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> Currently deleting qdisc with a large number of children and filters
> can take a lot of time:
>
> tc qdisc add dev lo root htb
> for I in `seq 1 1000`; do
> tc class add dev lo parent 1: classid 1:$I htb rate 100kbit
> tc qdisc
Currently deleting qdisc with a large number of children and filters
can take a lot of time:
tc qdisc add dev lo root htb
for I in `seq 1 1000`; do
tc class add dev lo parent 1: classid 1:$I htb rate 100kbit
tc qdisc add dev lo parent 1:$I handle $((I + 1)): htb
for J in `s
