Hi Andrew,
On Sun, May 17 2020, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>> > I don't think this should be done at mdiobus level; I think this is a
>> > layering violation. It needs to happen at the PHY level because the
>> > indirect C45 access via C22 registers is specific to PHYs.
>> >
>> > It also needs to check i
> > I don't think this should be done at mdiobus level; I think this is a
> > layering violation. It needs to happen at the PHY level because the
> > indirect C45 access via C22 registers is specific to PHYs.
> >
> > It also needs to check in the general case that the PHY does indeed
> > support t
Hi Russell,
On Sun, May 17 2020, Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote:
> On Sun, May 17, 2020 at 01:20:56PM +0300, Baruch Siach wrote:
>> When the MDIO bus does not support directly clause 45 access, fallback
>> to indirect registers access method to read/write clause 45 registers
>> using clause
On Sun, May 17, 2020 at 01:20:56PM +0300, Baruch Siach wrote:
> When the MDIO bus does not support directly clause 45 access, fallback
> to indirect registers access method to read/write clause 45 registers
> using clause 22 registers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Baruch Siach
> ---
>
> Is that the right
When the MDIO bus does not support directly clause 45 access, fallback
to indirect registers access method to read/write clause 45 registers
using clause 22 registers.
Signed-off-by: Baruch Siach
---
Is that the right course?
Currently, this does not really work on the my target machine, which
