On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 09:59:05PM -0800, David Miller wrote:
>
> So it's still a mystery why dhcp is causing bridge devices
> to trigger the network tap paths on Stephen's machine.
If this is the ISC DHCP daemon then perhaps it's because Stephen
didn't specify an interface for it to listen on? B
From: Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2007 16:38:45 +1100
> This is using packet_bind_spkt which uses a name instead of ifindex.
So it should be just fine, it should be binding to a specific
device (by name instead of ifindex) and therefore it should
only trigger the pt_all hook
David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm tempted to say I must be missing something here, since I can't see
> how this could possible work at all. The string passed in should
> be interpreted as the ifindex value, and thus trigger a -ENODEV
> return from AF_PACKET's bind() implementation.
From: Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 15:34:14 -0800
> Can you get FC fixed?
I am not the DHCP package maintainer. :-)
I'm up to my earfulls already dealing with people trying
to slug broken patches into the kernel networking that paper
around application bugs. ;)
>
On Fri, 02 Mar 2007 15:18:03 -0800 (PST)
David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2007 14:48:18 -0800 (PST)
>
> > Back to a workable solution, why doesn't DHCP specify a specific
> > device? It would fix this performance problem complet
From: David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2007 14:48:18 -0800 (PST)
> Back to a workable solution, why doesn't DHCP specify a specific
> device? It would fix this performance problem completely, at the
> application level.
Since nobody seems to be able to be bothered to actually l
From: Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 14:09:29 -0800
> On Fri, 02 Mar 2007 13:26:38 -0800 (PST)
> David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > From: Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 17:18:46 -0800
> >
> > > I was measuring bridging/rou
On Fri, 02 Mar 2007 13:26:38 -0800 (PST)
David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 17:18:46 -0800
>
> > I was measuring bridging/routing performance and noticed this.
> >
> > The current code runs the "all packet" type handlers
On Fri, 02 Mar 2007 13:26:38 -0800 (PST)
David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 17:18:46 -0800
>
> > I was measuring bridging/routing performance and noticed this.
> >
> > The current code runs the "all packet" type handlers
