Re: [RFC] net: sch_generic: fq_codel vs pfifo_fast

2019-03-27 Thread Marc Kleine-Budde
On 3/27/19 7:30 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote: >> on CAN networking hardware we (the CAN community) experience a lot silent, >> unwanted frame drops inside the kernel. (See first patch for details.) So >> here's a patch series to keep pfifo_fast as default scheduler for CAN >> hardware >> by default

Re: [RFC] net: sch_generic: fq_codel vs pfifo_fast

2019-03-27 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Wed, 27 Mar 2019 17:56:30 +0100 Marc Kleine-Budde wrote: > Hello, > > on CAN networking hardware we (the CAN community) experience a lot silent, > unwanted frame drops inside the kernel. (See first patch for details.) So > here's a patch series to keep pfifo_fast as default scheduler for CAN

[RFC] net: sch_generic: fq_codel vs pfifo_fast

2019-03-27 Thread Marc Kleine-Budde
Hello, on CAN networking hardware we (the CAN community) experience a lot silent, unwanted frame drops inside the kernel. (See first patch for details.) So here's a patch series to keep pfifo_fast as default scheduler for CAN hardware by default. Consider this as an RFC. Regards, Marc