From: Ralf Baechle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 21:49:46 +
> I believe all the below memory barriers only matter on SMP so therefore
> the smp_* variant of the barrier should be used.
>
> I'm wondering if the barrier in net/ipv4/inet_timewait_sock.c should be
> dropped entirely.
From: Ralf Baechle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 21:49:46 +
> I believe all the below memory barriers only matter on SMP so therefore
> the smp_* variant of the barrier should be used.
>
> I'm wondering if the barrier in net/ipv4/inet_timewait_sock.c should be
> dropped entirely.
I believe all the below memory barriers only matter on SMP so therefore
the smp_* variant of the barrier should be used.
I'm wondering if the barrier in net/ipv4/inet_timewait_sock.c should be
dropped entirely. schedule_work's implementation currently implies a
memory barrier and I think sane sem
