On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 1:43 AM Jarod Wilson wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 11:18 PM Andrew Lunn wrote:
...
> > I really think that before we consider changes like this, somebody
> > needs to work on git tooling, so that it knows when mass renames have
> > happened, and can do the same sort o
On Thu, 16 Jul 2020 11:59:47 -0700 (PDT)
David Miller wrote:
> From: Jarod Wilson
> Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2020 23:06:55 -0400
>
> > On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 9:00 PM David Miller wrote:
> >>
> >> From: Michal Kubecek
> >> Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2020 00:00:16 +0200
> >>
> >> > Could we, please, avoid
From: Jarod Wilson
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2020 23:06:55 -0400
> On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 9:00 PM David Miller wrote:
>>
>> From: Michal Kubecek
>> Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2020 00:00:16 +0200
>>
>> > Could we, please, avoid breaking existing userspace tools and scripts?
>>
>> I will not let UAPI breakage, d
On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 11:18 PM Andrew Lunn wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 11:04:16PM -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 8:26 PM Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Jarod
> > >
> > > Do you have this change scripted? Could you apply the script to v5.4
> > > and then cherry-
On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 11:04:16PM -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 8:26 PM Andrew Lunn wrote:
> >
> > Hi Jarod
> >
> > Do you have this change scripted? Could you apply the script to v5.4
> > and then cherry-pick the 8 bonding fixes that exist in v5.4.51. How
> > many result i
On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 9:00 PM David Miller wrote:
>
> From: Michal Kubecek
> Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2020 00:00:16 +0200
>
> > Could we, please, avoid breaking existing userspace tools and scripts?
>
> I will not let UAPI breakage, don't worry.
Seeking some clarification here. Does the output of
/pr
On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 8:26 PM Andrew Lunn wrote:
>
> Hi Jarod
>
> Do you have this change scripted? Could you apply the script to v5.4
> and then cherry-pick the 8 bonding fixes that exist in v5.4.51. How
> many result in conflicts?
>
> Could you do the same with v4.19...v4.19.132, which has 20
On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 8:57 AM Edward Cree wrote:
>
> Once again, the opinions below are my own and definitely do not
> represent anything my employer would be seen dead in the same
> room as.
>
> On 13/07/2020 23:41, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > As far as userspace, maybe keep the old API's bu
Once again, the opinions below are my own and definitely do not
represent anything my employer would be seen dead in the same
room as.
On 13/07/2020 23:41, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> As far as userspace, maybe keep the old API's but provide deprecation nags.
Why would you need to deprecate the o
On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 4:39 PM Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 09:17:48PM +0200, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
> > Jarod Wilson writes:
> >
> > > As part of an effort to help enact social change, Red Hat is
> > > committing to efforts to eliminate any problematic ter
On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 09:17:48PM +0200, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
> Jarod Wilson writes:
>
> > As part of an effort to help enact social change, Red Hat is
> > committing to efforts to eliminate any problematic terminology from
> > any of the software that it ships and supports. Front and c
Jarod Wilson writes:
> As part of an effort to help enact social change, Red Hat is
> committing to efforts to eliminate any problematic terminology from
> any of the software that it ships and supports. Front and center for
> me personally in that effort is the bonding driver's use of the terms
On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 8:55 PM Jay Vosburgh wrote:
>
> Stephen Hemminger wrote:
>
> >On Tue, 14 Jul 2020 00:00:16 +0200
> >Michal Kubecek wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 02:51:39PM -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> >> > To start out with, I'd like to attempt to eliminate as much of the use
>
On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 6:00 PM Michal Kubecek wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 02:51:39PM -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> > To start out with, I'd like to attempt to eliminate as much of the use
> > of master and slave in the bonding driver as possible. For the most
> > part, I think this can be d
On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 5:36 PM Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
> On 7/13/20 11:51 AM, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> > As part of an effort to help enact social change, Red Hat is
> > committing to efforts to eliminate any problematic terminology from
> > any of the software that it ships and supports. Front and ce
From: Michal Kubecek
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2020 00:00:16 +0200
> Could we, please, avoid breaking existing userspace tools and scripts?
I will not let UAPI breakage, don't worry.
Stephen Hemminger wrote:
>On Tue, 14 Jul 2020 00:00:16 +0200
>Michal Kubecek wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 02:51:39PM -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
>> > To start out with, I'd like to attempt to eliminate as much of the use
>> > of master and slave in the bonding driver as possible. For the m
From: Jarod Wilson
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2020 14:51:39 -0400
> To start out with, I'd like to attempt to eliminate as much of the use
> of master and slave in the bonding driver as possible. For the most
> part, I think this can be done without breaking UAPI, but may require
> changes to anything acc
Hi Jarod
Do you have this change scripted? Could you apply the script to v5.4
and then cherry-pick the 8 bonding fixes that exist in v5.4.51. How
many result in conflicts?
Could you do the same with v4.19...v4.19.132, which has 20 fixes.
This will give us an idea of the maintenance overhead such
On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 03:41:18PM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Jul 2020 00:00:16 +0200
> Michal Kubecek wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 02:51:39PM -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> > > To start out with, I'd like to attempt to eliminate as much of the use
> > > of master and slav
On Tue, 14 Jul 2020 00:00:16 +0200
Michal Kubecek wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 02:51:39PM -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> > To start out with, I'd like to attempt to eliminate as much of the use
> > of master and slave in the bonding driver as possible. For the most
> > part, I think this can be
On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 02:51:39PM -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> To start out with, I'd like to attempt to eliminate as much of the use
> of master and slave in the bonding driver as possible. For the most
> part, I think this can be done without breaking UAPI, but may require
> changes to anything
On 7/13/20 11:51 AM, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> As part of an effort to help enact social change, Red Hat is
> committing to efforts to eliminate any problematic terminology from
> any of the software that it ships and supports. Front and center for
> me personally in that effort is the bonding drive
As part of an effort to help enact social change, Red Hat is
committing to efforts to eliminate any problematic terminology from
any of the software that it ships and supports. Front and center for
me personally in that effort is the bonding driver's use of the terms
master and slave, and to a less
24 matches
Mail list logo
