Re: [RFC] Zero-length write() does not generate a datagram on connected socket

2007-09-28 Thread Michael Kerrisk
On 9/28/07, Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 27 Sep 2007 13:53:34 -0700 (PDT) > David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > From: Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 15:34:35 -0700 > > > > > The bug http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5731

Re: [RFC] Zero-length write() does not generate a datagram on connected socket

2007-09-27 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Thu, 27 Sep 2007 13:53:34 -0700 (PDT) David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 15:34:35 -0700 > > > The bug http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5731 > > describes an issue where write() can't be used to generate a zer

Re: [RFC] Zero-length write() does not generate a datagram on connected socket

2007-09-27 Thread David Miller
From: Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 15:34:35 -0700 > The bug http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5731 > describes an issue where write() can't be used to generate a zero-length > datagram (but send, and sendto do work). > > I think the following is needed: >

Re: [RFC] Zero-length write() does not generate a datagram on connected socket

2007-09-26 Thread Vlad Yasevich
Herbert Xu wrote: > Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> The bug http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5731 >> describes an issue where write() can't be used to generate a zero-length >> datagram (but send, and sendto do work). >> >> I think the following is needed: >> >> --- a/net/

Re: [RFC] Zero-length write() does not generate a datagram on connected socket

2007-09-26 Thread Rick Jones
Herbert Xu wrote: Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The bug http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5731 describes an issue where write() can't be used to generate a zero-length datagram (but send, and sendto do work). I think the following is needed: --- a/net/socket.c 200

Re: [RFC] Zero-length write() does not generate a datagram on connected socket

2007-09-25 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 11:18:39 +0800 Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The bug http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5731 > > describes an issue where write() can't be used to generate a zero-length > > datagram (but send, and sendto do wor

Re: [RFC] Zero-length write() does not generate a datagram on connected socket

2007-09-25 Thread Herbert Xu
Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The bug http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5731 > describes an issue where write() can't be used to generate a zero-length > datagram (but send, and sendto do work). > > I think the following is needed: > > --- a/net/socket.c 2007-08-20

[RFC] Zero-length write() does not generate a datagram on connected socket

2007-09-24 Thread Stephen Hemminger
The bug http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5731 describes an issue where write() can't be used to generate a zero-length datagram (but send, and sendto do work). I think the following is needed: --- a/net/socket.c 2007-08-20 09:54:28.0 -0700 +++ b/net/socket.c 2007-09-24