Re: [RFC] HTB initialize upper bound properly

2006-07-15 Thread Yoichi Yuasa
On Fri, 14 Jul 2006 16:32:45 -0700 (PDT) David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: Jamal Hadi Salim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 18:06:26 -0400 > > > On Fri, 2006-14-07 at 12:03 -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > > The upper bound for HTB time diff needs to be scaled to PSC

Re: [RFC] HTB initialize upper bound properly

2006-07-14 Thread David Miller
From: Jamal Hadi Salim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 18:06:26 -0400 > On Fri, 2006-14-07 at 12:03 -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > The upper bound for HTB time diff needs to be scaled to PSCHED > > units rather than just assuming usecs. The field mbuffer is used > > in TDIFF_SAFE(

Re: [RFC] HTB initialize upper bound properly

2006-07-14 Thread Jamal Hadi Salim
On Fri, 2006-14-07 at 12:03 -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > The upper bound for HTB time diff needs to be scaled to PSCHED > units rather than just assuming usecs. The field mbuffer is used > in TDIFF_SAFE(), as an upper bound. Untested... > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED

[RFC] HTB initialize upper bound properly

2006-07-14 Thread Stephen Hemminger
The upper bound for HTB time diff needs to be scaled to PSCHED units rather than just assuming usecs. The field mbuffer is used in TDIFF_SAFE(), as an upper bound. Untested... Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- netem-2.6.orig/net/sched/sch_htb.c +++ netem-2.6/net/sched/sc