Hi Andi,
I thank you for your comments.
Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Your suggestion, to utilize NET_XMIT_* code returned from an
> > underlying layer, is done in tcp_transmit_skb.
> >
> > But my problem is that tcp_transmit_skb is not called during a
> > certain period of time. S
> Your suggestion, to utilize NET_XMIT_* code returned from an
> underlying layer, is done in tcp_transmit_skb.
>
> But my problem is that tcp_transmit_skb is not called during a
> certain period of time. So I'm suggesting to cap RTO value so
> that tcp_transmit_skb gets called more frequently.
Hi Andi,
Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Please note first that I want to address physical failures by
> > the failover-capable network devices, which are increasingly
> > becoming important as Xen-based VM systems are getting popular.
> > Reducing a single-point-of-failure (physical de
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Please note first that I want to address physical failures by
> the failover-capable network devices, which are increasingly
> becoming important as Xen-based VM systems are getting popular.
> Reducing a single-point-of-failure (physical device) is vital on
> such VM sy
