Re: [RFC][SECMARK 03/08] Add xtables SECMARK target

2006-05-11 Thread Patrick McHardy
James Morris wrote: > On Wed, 10 May 2006, Patrick McHardy wrote: > > >>The netfilter parts all look fine too me (just one question, >>see below). Shall I add the userspace parts to SVN or do you >>want to do it yourself? > > > Might be better if you do it, although I'm still looking into one i

Re: [RFC][SECMARK 03/08] Add xtables SECMARK target

2006-05-10 Thread James Morris
On Wed, 10 May 2006, Patrick McHardy wrote: > The netfilter parts all look fine too me (just one question, > see below). Shall I add the userspace parts to SVN or do you > want to do it yourself? Might be better if you do it, although I'm still looking into one issue at this stage. > I wonder i

Re: [RFC][SECMARK 03/08] Add xtables SECMARK target

2006-05-09 Thread Patrick McHardy
James Morris wrote: > This patch adds a SECMARK target to xtables, allowing > the admin to apply security marks to packets via both > iptables and ip6tables. > > The target currently handles SELinux security marking, > but can be extended for other purposes as needed. The netfilter parts all look

[RFC][SECMARK 03/08] Add xtables SECMARK target

2006-05-07 Thread James Morris
This patch adds a SECMARK target to xtables, allowing the admin to apply security marks to packets via both iptables and ip6tables. The target currently handles SELinux security marking, but can be extended for other purposes as needed. Signed-off-by: James Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- incl