Daniel Phillips wrote:
That is why it has not yet been submitted upstream. Respectfully, I
do not think that jgarzik has yet put in the work to know if this anti
deadlock technique is reasonable or not, and he was only commenting
on some superficial blemish. I still don't get his point, if ther
David Miller wrote:
I think he's saying that he doesn't think your code is yet a
reasonable way to solve the problem, and therefore doesn't belong
upstream.
That is why it has not yet been submitted upstream. Respectfully, I
do not think that jgarzik has yet put in the work to know if this ant
Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Wed, 2006-08-09 at 02:30 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
David Miller wrote:
From: Daniel Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2006 22:51:20 -0700
Elaborate please. Do you think that all drivers should be updated to
fix the broken blockdev semantics, making NETIF
On Wed, 2006-08-09 at 02:30 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> David Miller wrote:
> > From: Daniel Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2006 22:51:20 -0700
> >
> >> Elaborate please. Do you think that all drivers should be updated to
> >> fix the broken blockdev semantics, making NETIF_F_
David Miller wrote:
From: Daniel Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2006 22:51:20 -0700
Elaborate please. Do you think that all drivers should be updated to
fix the broken blockdev semantics, making NETIF_F_MEMALLOC redundant?
If so, I trust you will help audit for it?
I think he
From: Daniel Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2006 22:51:20 -0700
> Elaborate please. Do you think that all drivers should be updated to
> fix the broken blockdev semantics, making NETIF_F_MEMALLOC redundant?
> If so, I trust you will help audit for it?
I think he's saying that he
Jeff Garzik wrote:
Peter Zijlstra wrote:
Update the driver to make use of the netdev_alloc_skb() API and the
NETIF_F_MEMALLOC feature.
NETIF_F_MEMALLOC does not exist in the upstream tree... nor should it,
IMO.
Elaborate please. Do you think that all drivers should be updated to
fix the b
Peter Zijlstra wrote:
Update the driver to make use of the netdev_alloc_skb() API and the
NETIF_F_MEMALLOC feature.
NETIF_F_MEMALLOC does not exist in the upstream tree... nor should it, IMO.
netdev_alloc_skb() is in the tree, and that's fine.
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list:
Update the driver to make use of the netdev_alloc_skb() API and the
NETIF_F_MEMALLOC feature.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
drivers/net/3c59x.c | 10 ++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Index: l
