On Mon, 2006-04-12 at 17:34 +0100, Thomas Graf wrote:
> * jamal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2006-12-04 08:09
> > Just makes the discovery more knowledgeable.
...
...
> > It would be a lot more human friendly to put better readability in the
> > commands.
>
> I don't agree to waste so much text section ju
* jamal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2006-12-04 08:09
> Just makes the discovery more knowledgeable.
> Theres a hidden meaning in that i would like if possible to create
> as much of user space as possible without the user having a single line
> written. Heres how i output the discovered families at the mo
On Mon, 2006-04-12 at 10:28 +0100, Thomas Graf wrote:
> * jamal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2006-12-02 07:11
> > [GENETLINK] introduce command names
> >
> > Introduce optional command names.
> > While command names can be put in user space by the author of the
> > command, this alleviates things for the d
* jamal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2006-12-02 07:11
> [GENETLINK] introduce command names
>
> Introduce optional command names.
> While command names can be put in user space by the author of the
> command, this alleviates things for the discovery process without
> requiring any user space code written.
Dave,
Same as before:
If there is no objections on this approach, please apply this patch.
Against net-2.6.20
cheers,
jamal
[GENETLINK] introduce command names
Introduce optional command names.
While command names can be put in user space by the author of the
command, this alleviates things for
