Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] CONFIG_FORCEDETH updates

2006-02-13 Thread Arthur Othieno
On Sun, Feb 12, 2006 at 05:03:36PM -0500, Lee Revell wrote: > On Sun, 2006-02-12 at 18:52 +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > This patch contains the following possible updates: > > - let FORCEDETH no longer depend on EXPERIMENTAL > > - remove the "Reverse Engineered" from the option text: > > for the

Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] CONFIG_FORCEDETH updates

2006-02-12 Thread Alistair John Strachan
On Sunday 12 February 2006 22:03, Lee Revell wrote: > On Sun, 2006-02-12 at 18:52 +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > This patch contains the following possible updates: > > - let FORCEDETH no longer depend on EXPERIMENTAL > > - remove the "Reverse Engineered" from the option text: > > for the user it'

Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] CONFIG_FORCEDETH updates

2006-02-12 Thread Lee Revell
On Sun, 2006-02-12 at 18:52 +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > This patch contains the following possible updates: > - let FORCEDETH no longer depend on EXPERIMENTAL > - remove the "Reverse Engineered" from the option text: > for the user it's important which hardware the driver supports, not > how it

[RFC: 2.6 patch] CONFIG_FORCEDETH updates

2006-02-12 Thread Adrian Bunk
This patch contains the following possible updates: - let FORCEDETH no longer depend on EXPERIMENTAL - remove the "Reverse Engineered" from the option text: for the user it's important which hardware the driver supports, not how it was developed Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>