Re: [RFC/PATCH 1/13] d80211: allow WDS remote to by set by WE

2006-03-16 Thread Jiri Benc
On Wed, 15 Mar 2006 15:58:45 -0800, Jouni Malinen wrote: > Neither did I at first, but after some debugging, I would assume that > you actually meant to return from ieee80211_ioctl_siwap() if the > previous address is identical to the new one, not if it has changed.. In > other words: > > [...] >

Re: [RFC/PATCH 1/13] d80211: allow WDS remote to by set by WE

2006-03-15 Thread Jouni Malinen
On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 07:24:05PM +0100, Jiri Benc wrote: > On Wed, 15 Mar 2006 09:52:26 -0800, Jouni Malinen wrote: > > This sounds good, but I was unable to get this working. I created a WDS > > link with initial peer address 00:01:02:03:04:05. This added the netdev > > and STA entry correctly.

Re: [RFC/PATCH 1/13] d80211: allow WDS remote to by set by WE

2006-03-15 Thread Jiri Benc
On Wed, 15 Mar 2006 09:52:26 -0800, Jouni Malinen wrote: > This sounds good, but I was unable to get this working. I created a WDS > link with initial peer address 00:01:02:03:04:05. This added the netdev > and STA entry correctly. However, when I run "iwconfig wds0 ap > 00:11:22:33:44:55", I do no

Re: [RFC/PATCH 1/13] d80211: allow WDS remote to by set by WE

2006-03-15 Thread Jouni Malinen
On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 04:44:21PM +0100, Jiri Benc wrote: > Setting of address of WDS remote peer wasn't possible by a WE call. Remote > WDS peer can be understood as a remote AP and SIOCSIWAP/SIOCGIWAP are unused > in WDS mode, so let's use them. This sounds good, but I was unable to get this wo

[RFC/PATCH 1/13] d80211: allow WDS remote to by set by WE

2006-03-06 Thread Jiri Benc
Setting of address of WDS remote peer wasn't possible by a WE call. Remote WDS peer can be understood as a remote AP and SIOCSIWAP/SIOCGIWAP are unused in WDS mode, so let's use them. Signed-off-by: Jiri Benc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Index: dscape/net/d80211/ieee80211.c ===