On 5/8/18 1:48 PM, 吉藤英明 wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2018-05-08 15:41 GMT+09:00 Andre Naujoks :
>> On 08.05.2018 08:31, 吉藤英明 wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> 2018-05-08 15:03 GMT+09:00 Andre Naujoks :
On 11.04.2018 13:02, Andre Naujoks wrote:
> Hi.
Hi again.
Since it has been a month now, I
Hi,
2018-05-08 15:41 GMT+09:00 Andre Naujoks :
> On 08.05.2018 08:31, 吉藤英明 wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> 2018-05-08 15:03 GMT+09:00 Andre Naujoks :
>>> On 11.04.2018 13:02, Andre Naujoks wrote:
Hi.
>>>
>>> Hi again.
>>>
>>> Since it has been a month now, I'd like to send a little "ping" on this
>>> su
On 08.05.2018 08:31, 吉藤英明 wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2018-05-08 15:03 GMT+09:00 Andre Naujoks :
>> On 11.04.2018 13:02, Andre Naujoks wrote:
>>> Hi.
>>
>> Hi again.
>>
>> Since it has been a month now, I'd like to send a little "ping" on this
>> subject.
>>
>> Is anything wrong with this? Or was it just ba
Hi,
2018-05-08 15:03 GMT+09:00 Andre Naujoks :
> On 11.04.2018 13:02, Andre Naujoks wrote:
>> Hi.
>
> Hi again.
>
> Since it has been a month now, I'd like to send a little "ping" on this
> subject.
>
> Is anything wrong with this? Or was it just bad timing?
I'm just curious... What kind of beha
On 11.04.2018 13:02, Andre Naujoks wrote:
> Hi.
Hi again.
Since it has been a month now, I'd like to send a little "ping" on this subject.
Is anything wrong with this? Or was it just bad timing?
Regards
Andre
>
> I was running into a problem, when trying to join multiple multicast groups
>
Hi.
I was running into a problem, when trying to join multiple multicast groups
on a single socket and thus binding to the any-address on said socket. I
received traffic from multicast groups, I did not join on that socket and
was at first surprised by that. After reading some old e-mails/threads,
