Re: [RFC,PATCH] loopback: calls netif_receive_skb() instead of netif_rx()

Eric Dumazet wrote: Daniel Lezcano a écrit : Eric Dumazet wrote: Hi David This is an RFC, based on net-2.6 for convenience only. Thank you [RFC,PATCH] loopback: calls netif_receive_skb() instead of netif_rx() Loopback transmit function loopback_xmit() actually calls netif_rx() to queue a

Re: [RFC,PATCH] loopback: calls netif_receive_skb() instead of netif_rx()

Daniel Lezcano a écrit : Eric Dumazet wrote: Hi David This is an RFC, based on net-2.6 for convenience only. Thank you [RFC,PATCH] loopback: calls netif_receive_skb() instead of netif_rx() Loopback transmit function loopback_xmit() actually calls netif_rx() to queue a skb to the softnet

Re: [RFC,PATCH] loopback: calls netif_receive_skb() instead of netif_rx()

Eric Dumazet wrote: Hi David This is an RFC, based on net-2.6 for convenience only. Thank you [RFC,PATCH] loopback: calls netif_receive_skb() instead of netif_rx() Loopback transmit function loopback_xmit() actually calls netif_rx() to queue a skb to the softnet queue, and arms a softirq so

[RFC,PATCH] loopback: calls netif_receive_skb() instead of netif_rx()

Hi David This is an RFC, based on net-2.6 for convenience only. Thank you [RFC,PATCH] loopback: calls netif_receive_skb() instead of netif_rx() Loopback transmit function loopback_xmit() actually calls netif_rx() to queue a skb to the softnet queue, and arms a softirq so that this skb can be