On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 1:03 AM, Amir Vadai wrote:
>
>> -#define tc_single_action(_exts) \
>> - (list_is_singular(&(_exts)->actions))
>> +#define tc_no_actions(_exts) (&(_exts)->nr_actions == 0)
>> +#define tc_single_action(_exts) (&(_exts)->nr_actions == 1)
>
> Should remove the '&' here.
On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 11:46 PM, Cong Wang wrote:
> As pointed out by Jamal, an action could be shared by
> multiple filters, so we can't use list to chain them
> any more after we get rid of the original tc_action.
> Instead, we could just save pointers to these actions
> in tcf_exts, since they
As pointed out by Jamal, an action could be shared by
multiple filters, so we can't use list to chain them
any more after we get rid of the original tc_action.
Instead, we could just save pointers to these actions
in tcf_exts, since they are refcount'ed, so convert
the list to a flex array.
The ug
