On Wed, May 1, 2019 at 6:11 AM Eran Ben Elisha wrote:
>
>
>
> On 4/30/2019 9:50 PM, Cong Wang wrote:
> > Although devlink health report does a nice job on reporting TX
> > timeout and other NIC errors, unfortunately it requires drivers
> > to support it but currently only mlx5 has implemented it.
On Wed, 2019-05-01 at 13:11 +, Eran Ben Elisha wrote:
>
> On 4/30/2019 9:50 PM, Cong Wang wrote:
> > Although devlink health report does a nice job on reporting TX
> > timeout and other NIC errors, unfortunately it requires drivers
> > to support it but currently only mlx5 has implemented it.
On 4/30/2019 9:50 PM, Cong Wang wrote:
> Although devlink health report does a nice job on reporting TX
> timeout and other NIC errors, unfortunately it requires drivers
> to support it but currently only mlx5 has implemented it.
The devlink health was never intended to be the generic mechanism
Although devlink health report does a nice job on reporting TX
timeout and other NIC errors, unfortunately it requires drivers
to support it but currently only mlx5 has implemented it.
Before other drivers could catch up, it is useful to have a
generic tracepoint to monitor this kind of TX timeout.