Cong Wang wrote:
> From: Cong Wang
>
> Currently we rely on lock_sock to protect ingress_msg,
> it is too big for this, we can actually just use a spinlock
> to protect this list like protecting other skb queues.
>
> __tcp_bpf_recvmsg() is still special because of peeking,
> it still has to use
From: Cong Wang
Currently we rely on lock_sock to protect ingress_msg,
it is too big for this, we can actually just use a spinlock
to protect this list like protecting other skb queues.
__tcp_bpf_recvmsg() is still special because of peeking,
it still has to use lock_sock.
Cc: John Fastabend
C
