On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 6:25 PM Yunsheng Lin wrote:
>
> On 2021/3/23 8:37, Cong Wang wrote:
> > +static inline struct sk_msg *sk_psock_next_msg(struct sk_psock *psock,
> > +struct sk_msg *msg)
> > +{
> > + struct sk_msg *ret;
>
> Nit:
> Use msg inste
On 2021/3/23 8:37, Cong Wang wrote:
> From: Cong Wang
>
> Currently we rely on lock_sock to protect ingress_msg,
> it is too big for this, we can actually just use a spinlock
> to protect this list like protecting other skb queues.
>
> __tcp_bpf_recvmsg() is still special because of peeking,
> i
From: Cong Wang
Currently we rely on lock_sock to protect ingress_msg,
it is too big for this, we can actually just use a spinlock
to protect this list like protecting other skb queues.
__tcp_bpf_recvmsg() is still special because of peeking,
it still has to use lock_sock.
Cc: John Fastabend
C
