Re: [Patch bpf-next v3 3/9] udp: implement ->sendmsg_locked()

Cong Wang wrote: > On Fri, Mar 5, 2021 at 5:21 PM John Fastabend > wrote: > > > > Cong Wang wrote: > > > From: Cong Wang > > > > > > UDP already has udp_sendmsg() which takes lock_sock() inside. > > > We have to build ->sendmsg_locked() on top of it, by adding > > > a new parameter for whether t

Re: [Patch bpf-next v3 3/9] udp: implement ->sendmsg_locked()

On Fri, Mar 5, 2021 at 5:21 PM John Fastabend wrote: > > Cong Wang wrote: > > From: Cong Wang > > > > UDP already has udp_sendmsg() which takes lock_sock() inside. > > We have to build ->sendmsg_locked() on top of it, by adding > > a new parameter for whether the sock has been locked. > > > > Cc:

RE: [Patch bpf-next v3 3/9] udp: implement ->sendmsg_locked()

Cong Wang wrote: > From: Cong Wang > > UDP already has udp_sendmsg() which takes lock_sock() inside. > We have to build ->sendmsg_locked() on top of it, by adding > a new parameter for whether the sock has been locked. > > Cc: John Fastabend > Cc: Daniel Borkmann > Cc: Jakub Sitnicki > Cc: Lo

[Patch bpf-next v3 3/9] udp: implement ->sendmsg_locked()

From: Cong Wang UDP already has udp_sendmsg() which takes lock_sock() inside. We have to build ->sendmsg_locked() on top of it, by adding a new parameter for whether the sock has been locked. Cc: John Fastabend Cc: Daniel Borkmann Cc: Jakub Sitnicki Cc: Lorenz Bauer Signed-off-by: Cong Wang