Hello:
This patch was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (refs/heads/master):
On Tue, 6 Apr 2021 20:21:11 -0700 you wrote:
> From: Cong Wang
>
> Using sk_psock() to retrieve psock pointer from sock requires
> RCU read lock, but we already get psock pointer before calling
> ->psock_update_sk_prot() in
On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 05:21 AM CEST, Cong Wang wrote:
> From: Cong Wang
>
> Using sk_psock() to retrieve psock pointer from sock requires
> RCU read lock, but we already get psock pointer before calling
> ->psock_update_sk_prot() in both cases, so we can just pass it
> without bothering sk_psock
Cong Wang wrote:
> From: Cong Wang
>
> Using sk_psock() to retrieve psock pointer from sock requires
> RCU read lock, but we already get psock pointer before calling
> ->psock_update_sk_prot() in both cases, so we can just pass it
> without bothering sk_psock().
>
> Reported-and-tested-by: syzbo
From: Cong Wang
Using sk_psock() to retrieve psock pointer from sock requires
RCU read lock, but we already get psock pointer before calling
->psock_update_sk_prot() in both cases, so we can just pass it
without bothering sk_psock().
Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+320a3bc8d80f478c3...@syzkaller.
