I see. The build was fine under x86 and there are so many warnings that a
-Werror probably won't work for me.
thanks,
Catherine
David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 08/02/2006 06:19:06 PM:
> From: Xiaolan Zhang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 18:18:07 -0400
>
> > I did test i
From: Xiaolan Zhang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 18:18:07 -0400
> I did test it with CONFIG_SECURITY disabled, but did not catch the warning
> -- I verified that the build completes with a valid vmlinux image. There
> are many warnings (device drivers, and others) during the build
David,
I did test it with CONFIG_SECURITY disabled, but did not catch the warning
-- I verified that the build completes with a valid vmlinux image. There
are many warnings (device drivers, and others) during the build and I
didn't do a grep to find which one is specific to my patch. Next tim
From: Xiaolan Zhang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 17:14:31 -0400
> I will remember this in the future, I promise.
Can you also remember to test your patches with CONFIG_SECURITY
disabled, as you also promised in the past several times?!??!?!
In file included from init/main.c:34:
incl
David,
I will remember this in the future, I promise.
thank you,
Catherine
David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 08/02/2006 05:11:03 PM:
>
> Catherine you really must begin to remember to add
> proper "Signed-off-by: " lines to your patch submissions.
>
> I'll sign off on this bug fix, bu
Catherine you really must begin to remember to add
proper "Signed-off-by: " lines to your patch submissions.
I'll sign off on this bug fix, but in the future I will not
do so for you any more as you've been told at least 3 or 4
times about this.
Thank you.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send t
Hi Catherine,
On 02/08/06, Catherine Zhang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi, all,
Enclosed please find the updated patch incorporating comments from
Stephen and Dave.
Thanks!
Again thanks for your help!
Catherine
--
Regards,
Michal
--
Michal K. K. Piotrowski
LTG - Linux Testers Group
(htt
On Wed, 2006-08-02 at 02:47 -0400, Catherine Zhang wrote:
> Hi, all,
>
> Enclosed please find the updated patch incorporating comments from
> Stephen and Dave.
Note that this patch is intended for 2.6.18 as a bug fix for the memory
leak introduced by the original dgram peersec patches.
> Again t
Hi, all,
Enclosed please find the updated patch incorporating comments from
Stephen and Dave.
Again thanks for your help!
Catherine
--
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This patch implements a cleaner fix for the memory leak problem of the original
unix datagram getpeersec patch. Instead of creating
