Emmanuel Fusté <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
[...]
> Did you plan to submit the "spin_lock_irqsave" patch to mainline ?
No. I will not have enough time to figure why/if it fixes things.
--
Ueimor
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTE
Emmanuel Fusté <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
[..]
> Could this bug fix from Stephen Hemminger be another track to follow ?
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=118048588011069&w=2
> If you think so, I could give it a try whitout applying the
> "spin_lock_irqsave" patch.
You can apply it too but Stephen's
Thomas Bogendoerfer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
[...]
> for normal interrupt delivery it doesn't matter, because there shouldn't
> be any more interrupts coming in at that point. But netconsole uses
> pcnet32_interrupt for polling the chip. So if during service of a
> a real interrupt a polled pcnet32_in
Lennart Sorensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
[...]
> Hmm, I have been seeing lockups too and asked about doing something
> almost exactly the same as this recently, but was told that it shouldn't
> need irqs disabled at this point.
Yes. The patch should not be needed.
OTOH, it is still interesting to k
On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 02:31:48PM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 05:25:51PM +0200, Emmanuel Fust? wrote:
> > > Any difference if you disable the debug messages in the pcnet32
> > > driver and you apply the patch below ?
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/net/pcnet32.c b/dr
On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 05:25:51PM +0200, Emmanuel Fust? wrote:
> > Any difference if you disable the debug messages in the pcnet32
> > driver and you apply the patch below ?
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/pcnet32.c b/drivers/net/pcnet32.c
> > index 9c171a7..be4513f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/
> Any difference if you disable the debug messages in the pcnet32
> driver and you apply the patch below ?
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/pcnet32.c b/drivers/net/pcnet32.c
> index 9c171a7..be4513f 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/pcnet32.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/pcnet32.c
> @@ -2556,11 +2556,12 @@ pcnet32_in
Emmanuel Fusté <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
> Ok will try and report the result.
> Thanks.
Please:
1. don't top-post.
2. trim the quoted message to keep its relevant part.
--
Ueimor
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More ma
Ok will try and report the result.
Thanks.
> Emmanuel Fusté <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
> [...]
> > Just to let you know that I swap my pcnet32 with a via-rhine
> > and I no longer experienced hard machine lock after loading
> > netconsole.
>
> Any difference if you disable the debug messages in the pcn
Emmanuel Fusté <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
[...]
> Just to let you know that I swap my pcnet32 with a via-rhine
> and I no longer experienced hard machine lock after loading
> netconsole.
Any difference if you disable the debug messages in the pcnet32
driver and you apply the patch below ?
diff --git a
Hello,
Just to let you know that I swap my pcnet32 with a via-rhine
and I no longer experienced hard machine lock after loading
netconsole.
Regards,
Emmanuel.
> Hello,
> While trying to obtain scsi log to debug a driver problem, I
> tried to use netconsole on an old smp system with a 10Mbits
> p
11 matches
Mail list logo
