RE: [PATCHv3 net-next 0/5] sctp: update from rfc7829

2019-10-17 Thread David Laight
From: Xin Long > Sent: 17 October 2019 05:57 ... > > I'm only an SCTP user, but I think some of the API changes aren't right. > Hi, David L. > > I think you must know quite a few user cases. > > Before I repost, can you pls give the exact places where the API > changes may not be right as you've

Re: [PATCHv3 net-next 0/5] sctp: update from rfc7829

2019-10-16 Thread Xin Long
On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 6:42 PM David Laight wrote: > > From: David Miller > > Sent: 16 October 2019 01:57 > > From: Xin Long > > Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2019 14:14:43 +0800 > > > > > SCTP-PF was implemented based on a Internet-Draft in 2012: > > > > > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nishida-tsvw

Re: [PATCHv3 net-next 0/5] sctp: update from rfc7829

2019-10-16 Thread David Miller
From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2019 15:32:09 -0300 > On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 02:25:34PM -0400, David Miller wrote: >> From: Xin Long >> Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2019 14:14:43 +0800 >> >> > SCTP-PF was implemented based on a Internet-Draft in 2012: >> > >> > https://tools.ietf.org/h

Re: [PATCHv3 net-next 0/5] sctp: update from rfc7829

2019-10-16 Thread Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 02:25:34PM -0400, David Miller wrote: > From: Xin Long > Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2019 14:14:43 +0800 > > > SCTP-PF was implemented based on a Internet-Draft in 2012: > > > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nishida-tsvwg-sctp-failover-05 > > > > It's been updated quite a fe

Re: [PATCHv3 net-next 0/5] sctp: update from rfc7829

2019-10-16 Thread David Miller
From: Xin Long Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2019 14:14:43 +0800 > SCTP-PF was implemented based on a Internet-Draft in 2012: > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nishida-tsvwg-sctp-failover-05 > > It's been updated quite a few by rfc7829 in 2016. > > This patchset adds the following features: Sorry b

RE: [PATCHv3 net-next 0/5] sctp: update from rfc7829

2019-10-16 Thread David Laight
From: David Miller > Sent: 16 October 2019 01:57 > From: Xin Long > Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2019 14:14:43 +0800 > > > SCTP-PF was implemented based on a Internet-Draft in 2012: > > > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nishida-tsvwg-sctp-failover-05 > > > > It's been updated quite a few by rfc7829 in

Re: [PATCHv3 net-next 0/5] sctp: update from rfc7829

2019-10-15 Thread David Miller
From: Xin Long Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2019 14:14:43 +0800 > SCTP-PF was implemented based on a Internet-Draft in 2012: > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nishida-tsvwg-sctp-failover-05 > > It's been updated quite a few by rfc7829 in 2016. > > This patchset adds the following features: > > 1

Re: [PATCHv3 net-next 0/5] sctp: update from rfc7829

2019-10-14 Thread Neil Horman
On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 02:14:43PM +0800, Xin Long wrote: > SCTP-PF was implemented based on a Internet-Draft in 2012: > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nishida-tsvwg-sctp-failover-05 > > It's been updated quite a few by rfc7829 in 2016. > > This patchset adds the following features: > >

[PATCHv3 net-next 0/5] sctp: update from rfc7829

2019-10-13 Thread Xin Long
SCTP-PF was implemented based on a Internet-Draft in 2012: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nishida-tsvwg-sctp-failover-05 It's been updated quite a few by rfc7829 in 2016. This patchset adds the following features: 1. add SCTP_ADDR_POTENTIALLY_FAILED notification 2. add pf_expose per ne