>
> That doesn't matter. This happens all the time.
>
> The way you handle this is you submit patch #1 targetting 'net' and
> wait for it to get into 'net' and propagate into 'net-next'. When
> that happens you can submit patches #2-5 as a second patch series
> targetting 'net-next'.
Thanks, wil
On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 11:17:16AM -0400, David Miller wrote:
> From: Xin Long
> Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2016 20:35:40 +0800
>
> >>
> >>> This patchset is to improve some codes about prsctp polices, and also
> >>> to fix some issues.
> >>>
> >>> v1->v2:
> >>> - wrap the check of chunk->sent_count in
From: Xin Long
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2016 20:35:40 +0800
>>
>>> This patchset is to improve some codes about prsctp polices, and also
>>> to fix some issues.
>>>
>>> v1->v2:
>>> - wrap the check of chunk->sent_count in a macro:
>>> sctp_chunk_retransmitted in patch 2/5.
>>
>> This series is a m
>
>> This patchset is to improve some codes about prsctp polices, and also
>> to fix some issues.
>>
>> v1->v2:
>> - wrap the check of chunk->sent_count in a macro:
>> sctp_chunk_retransmitted in patch 2/5.
>
> This series is a mix of bug fixes (patch #1) which should be targetting
> 'net' an
From: Xin Long
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2016 18:46:27 +0800
> This patchset is to improve some codes about prsctp polices, and also
> to fix some issues.
>
> v1->v2:
> - wrap the check of chunk->sent_count in a macro:
> sctp_chunk_retransmitted in patch 2/5.
This series is a mix of bug fixes (pa
On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 06:46:27PM +0800, Xin Long wrote:
> This patchset is to improve some codes about prsctp polices, and also
> to fix some issues.
>
> v1->v2:
> - wrap the check of chunk->sent_count in a macro:
> sctp_chunk_retransmitted in patch 2/5.
>
> Xin Long (5):
> sctp: move s
This patchset is to improve some codes about prsctp polices, and also
to fix some issues.
v1->v2:
- wrap the check of chunk->sent_count in a macro:
sctp_chunk_retransmitted in patch 2/5.
Xin Long (5):
sctp: move sent_count to the memory hole in sctp_chunk
sctp: reuse sent_count to avoid
